All Categories
Featured
Table of Contents
Secret difficulties include recognizing and handling these threats effectively, balancing staff member needs with compliance, and adjusting MTC guidelines for safe and secure and economical mobility. If managed well, remote work can be a tactical advantage for multinationals, using operational continuity and access to skill. Relying on outdated policies could develop liabilities, such as unexpected tax direct exposure and compliance problems.
Daida Hadzic is Director, KPMG LLP.
Words by Kevin McKenna, Elder Advisor, EMIR Mirages often deceive the eye in the desert, promising water and relief where there is none. The Middle East, at the minute, can appear daunting to global service leaders who mistakenly look at it as one uniform bloc. Unlike mirages, and in spite of geopolitical tensions in the more comprehensive area, the Gulf Co-Operation Council (GCC) economies' potential is no illusion.
Yet, numerous regional leaders of international business still have a hard time to unshackle themselves from misconceptions and predispositions held by a worldwide HQ that often looks at the Middle East through a narrow keyhole. International budget holders' often misdirected perspectives can lead to missed out on chances and prevent development. With over a years of experience recommending local business leaders in the Middle East, I've seen how vital it is to make the case for the region by focusing on these five easy actions.

Nevertheless, this location likewise operates extremely in a different way from our domestic market, so don't expect the exact same direct pathways to growth and timelines." This technique requires robust preparation, clear interaction, a deep local network and an abundant understanding of the regional company environment since, ultimately, you need to provide on that guaranteed development.
By dispelling misconceptions and engaging proactively, regional CEOs can unlock the region's true potential, changing viewed mirages into a sanctuary of opportunities waiting to be discovered.
Organize a session with our experts to check out how YCP can assist you in addressing your service obstacles.
Relating to Israel's controversial policies of limiting humanitarian help into Gaza, the Trump administration has followed Netanyahu's lead.
Taken together, these policies reflect two intertwined components of the Trump administration's method to Gaza: a deference to Prime Minister Netanyahu's choices and a deprioritization of humanitarian needs. The administration has actually not pushed back on the Israeli federal government's strategies to inhabit Gaza City and by force evacuate Palestinians into a smaller location of Gaza.
He subsequently published on social media that the only method to get captives out of Gaza is when Hamas is "confronted and damaged," apparently offering indirect support for Israel's expanding operations. Meanwhile, the Trump administration's complacent method to Gaza's intensifying humanitarian situationmarked by a formal statement of scarcity in parts of Gazaunderscores the disastrous effect of its submission to the Israeli government's rejection to offer sufficient aid to the besieged area. They can best be caught by unloading how Israel and Saudi Arabiaeach with strong ties to the United Stateshave responded. Not surprisingly, their reactions differ significantly in all three cases. Their actions likewise reflect the growing disparity between these 2 regional powers as they pursue commonly varying methods for how to form the Middle East's emerging order.
Israel has not translated these military gains into sustaining tactical wins. For Saudi Arabiathe Arab world's current center of gravitythe important for financial diversification has fueled a drive to de-escalate stress in the region, a push for post-conflict stabilization in the Levant, and aspirations to construct out industrial and trade ties across the Middle East and beyond.
Similar to Israel, however, whether and how Saudi Arabia equates its expanding take advantage of into lasting strategic gains remains to be seen. Israel was highly helpful of the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. For years and across several U.S. administrations, Prime Minister Netanyahu looked for U.S. support for and participation in strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
Going forward, Netanyahu will look to maintain U.S. support, specifically if Iran begins to rebuild its ballistic rocket arsenal or reboot enrichment. Israel has actually explained that it will strike Iran againideally with U.S. supportin either situation. Missing a clear U.S. "red light" opposing further Israeli military intervention in Iran, potentially combined with a U.S.Significantly, the Gulf views Israel, not Iran, as the primary threat to local stability. Moving forward, Riyadh will push hard for a diplomatic resolution to Iran's conflict with the United States and Israel. While Saudi Arabia most likely is heartened by Iran's weakened position, it sees with alarm the possibility of deepening interstate conflict between Israel and Iran.
Latest Posts

Leveraging Market Research to Effectively Drive Strategic Growth

Corporate Strategy for GCC Excellence

Ways to Leverage Market Research for 2026 Success